Seccomp Profiles for Container-Based Sandboxes
Seccomp alone won't contain AI-generated code—you need layered sandboxes.
AI-generated code changes which sandbox boundary you actually need.
Seccomp alone won't contain AI-generated code—you need layered sandboxes.
AI-generated code demands isolation, but gVisor and Firecracker disagree on how.
Four isolation primitives power AI code execution, each with different security and speed tradeoffs.
AI-generated code needs stronger boundaries than containers were built to provide.
Docker's shared kernel leaves untrusted AI code vulnerable to escape despite careful configuration.
AI-generated code flows through pipelines faster than traditional safeguards can catch flaws.
How to test AI agents for exploitable gaps between code generation and execution.
Hallucinated package names recur predictably, letting attackers register them first.
LLM-augmented tools detect twice as many vulnerabilities as rule-based scanners.
Restricting AI agents to minimal OS permissions limits damage from vulnerable generated code.
AI-generated code contains nearly three times more vulnerabilities than human-written code.